More Gaslighting from the Gray Lady
The covid shots have turned out to be the most spectacular failure in vaccine history. These products cause covid infection in the first 1-2 weeks after administration. After that, they may provide a transient period of protection against the covid, but this comes at the cost of an increase in all serious adverse events. This protection against covid infection wanes rapidly, and booster shots don’t help – Moderna’s own study showed efficacy dropped to less than zero within five months after the third shot. A study by the Cleveland Clinic showed the likelihood of re-infection increased with the number of boosters. Indeed, we are doing violence to the English language by calling these product “vaccines.”
These shots have been foisted on literally billions of people, the vast majority of whom had no idea about any of this, and since then reports of serious adverse events and deaths to post-marketing surveillance databases have skyrocketed. How are the legacy media reacting to all this? A 7 September article in the paper of record gives us a hint.
Titled “How Covid Affects the Heart,” the article notes that for the years 2020-2021, there were approximately 90,000 more cardiovascular disease deaths than we would have expected, and that the sharpest rise in deaths was found in 25–44-year-olds.
Well, that’s not really surprising. We know the coronavirus spike protein damages the endothelium lining the capillaries, the body’s smallest blood vessels, and by extension the heart and just about every other organ in the body. But we also know the shot hijack’s the body’s cellular machinery, forcing it to churn out unknown quantities of this same toxic spike protein.
Given that both the coronavirus and the shot can produce many of the same toxic effects, it would have been enormously helpful if the article had broken down these results by year, but it didn’t. But a quick dash through the CDC Wonder database shows that the rate of cardiovascular deaths did indeed soar during the year 2020 (the first year of the pandemic), but it also shows that the rate barely budged in 2021 (the year the vax was rolled out) and in fact increased in 25–44-year-olds.
This is not what happens when treatments work.
So is the cure as bad (or worse) than the disease? The article attempts to put these fears to rest:
A study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that males ages 12 to 29 – who have the greatest risk of vaccine complications – were four to eight times more likely to develop myocarditis following a covid infection than in the three weeks after receiving a dose of vaccine.
But this sidesteps the pertinent question here. As we have noted, while the shots may provide a transient period of protection against covid infection, the absolute reduction in risk is tiny. The study that formed the basis of the Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer shot reported a one in 141 reduction in the risk of infection for the follow-up period (averaging two months, and not beginning until twenty-eight days after the first dose). In other words, out of 141 patients who received the vax, 140 did not benefit during the study period – but all 141 were exposed to the toxic effects. And even the one in 141 figure is an exaggeration, since it does not include cases that arose in the twenty-eight days after the first dose (before the patient is considered “fully vaccinated”). That’s why the CDC figure of “four to eight times more likely” is so misleading. No correction is made for the fact that, during the brief period when the shot might have provided protection, the vast majority of unvaccinated patients will not contract the covid anyway.
This is a breathtakingly mendacious argument, akin to comparing all the drunk drivers in the country with all the sober drivers who have already been in car accidents, and concluding that drunk driving is safer than sober driving.
May I be permitted a personal anecdote? In twenty-eight years of teaching, I never missed a day of work due to illness. Less than thirty days after my booster shot (which I took on pain of losing my livelihood if I didn’t) I was hospitalized for an ischemic stroke.
The next day I asked the neurologist point-blank if the shot caused this. His answer almost knocked me off my feet:
Well, were now seeing eighteen-year-olds coming in with strokes, and in those cases it’s obvious what’s causing this, but at your age it’s not so certain.
This man is a neurologist, and he was talking to me about eighteen-year-olds getting strokes as blandly as if we were talking about the weather.
We have just barely begun to plumb the depths of the harms dome by these products. Meanwhile, our rulers have crossed the Rubicon. They can’t admit they were wrong now. So we may expect the gaslighting from the drug-company-funded media to continue.
My book The Day the Science Died: Covid Vaccines and the Power of Fear is now available on amazon.